Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 22 Aug 1995 08:49:37 EST |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Amy: I'm glad that you corrected me on my casual statement about
NEH's grass-roots impact. Actually, I am reasonably familiar with
the NEH's Museums Program, being the project developer, writer,
and director for planning and implementation grants that are
running at the NY Botanical Garden right now. Our program is
indeed intended to make NYBG more accessible on different levels
to different audiences. I am much less familiar with State
Humanities Council programs that I am with local arts councils.
I just have an intuitive sense that concerts, theatre, dance,
etc outside the major urban concentrations are a stronger selling
point for Congress. That intuition seems to have been reinforced
by the House of Representatives' hearings, where the NEH was
lambasted for the academic/curriculum side of its work (the
history standards it funded), and the NEA was praised for its
democratizing influence (though it also came in for its share of
knocks.) Or at least thats how it came across in the local press.
Amy, thanks again for calling me on that, I stand corrected.
Eric Siegel
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|