MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Rich Jones <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 26 Feb 1995 12:42:00 PST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (182 lines)
As a follow-up to the ISTE post re: ed. cuts, the following post from the
ALA has some facts that may be of interest to many on the museum-l list.
 
>>From [log in to unmask] Sun Feb 26 04:36:12 1995
>Date: Fri, 24 Feb 1995 17:29:56 -0500
>From: ALA Washington Office <[log in to unmask]>
>Reply to: ALA Washington Office Update <[log in to unmask]>
>To: Multiple recipients of list ALA-WO <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: ALAWON, Vol. 4, No. 15
>
>****Begin File******************Begin File*******************Begin File****
>***************************************************************************
>                                                             ISSN 1069-7799
>                                  ALAWON
>                      ALA Washington Office Newsline
>                     An electronic publication of the
>              American Library Association Washington Office
>
>                            Volume 4, Number 15
>                             February 24, 1995
>
>   In this issue: (164 lines)
>     ACTION ALERT:  IMMEDIATE ACTION NEEDED TO PROTECT LIBRARY PROGRAMS
>          CONTACT HOUSE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE LISTED BELOW
>
>***************************************************************************
>
>    ACTION ALERT:  IMMEDIATE ACTION NEEDED TO PROTECT LIBRARY PROGRAMS
>
>As reported in yesterday's ALAWON, major rescissions (or defunding) of FY
>1995 library program appropriations have been recommended by the House
>Appropriations Subcommittee for Labor, Health and Human Services, and
>Education.  The subcommittee vote was straight down party lines, with all
>Republicans voting for the cuts.  This is like all the other markup votes
>by other appropriations subcommittees cutting many programs, including
>agencies benefitting libraries such as the National Endowments for the Arts
>and Humanities.
>
>The following is a more complete table of selected library and related
>programs slated for cuts in FY95 funding, as approved by various House
>appropriations subcommittees on February 22 or 23:
>
>PROGRAM                             FY95 FUNDING       FY95 AMOUNT PROPOSED
>                                    (in millions)         FOR DEFUNDING
>                                                          (in millions)
>
>LSCA II pub. lib. construction        $  17.8             $  15.3
>LSCA VI lib. literacy program             8.0                 8.0
>HEA II-B lib. ed. & training              4.9                 4.9
>HEA II-B lib. research & demo.            6.5                 6.5
>ESEA III educ. tech                      40.0                30.0
>Star schools                             30.0                30.0
>School facilities                       100.0               100.0
>Inexp. book distrib. (RIF)               10.3                 5.3
>Natl. Institute for Literacy              4.9                 4.9
>Four other small literacy programs       41.1                41.1
>Natl. Endowment for the Arts            167.7               162.7
>Natl. Endowment for the Humanities      177.4               172.4
>Corp. for Public Broadcasting   ($285.6m - cut 15% in FY96, 30% in FY97)
>NTIA Info. Infrastructure Grants         64.0                30.0
>
>WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?  The full House Appropriations Committee will meet on
>March 2 to package all the subcommittee recommendations into one large
>rescission bill, and send it to the House floor.  After House passage, the
>Senate Appropriations Committee would consider the measure.  The cuts or
>terminations would not become effective until after House and Senate
>passage, any reconciling of House-Senate differences, and until after
>President Clinton signed the bill or Congress overrode a veto.
>
>STRATEGY:  The ALA Washington Office staff will be participating with its
>major education coalition of 100 organizations, the Committee for Education
>Funding, in a day of visits to congressional offices on Tuesday, February
>28.  The aim will be to show that in education and libraries, every dollar
>counts; to provide information about the impact of the proposed $1.7
>billion cut in education funding; to identify legislators who may support
>reversing the cuts; and to develop House and Senate strategy.
>
>ACTION NEEDED AT HOME:  Every congressional office should hear from library
>constituents in opposition to the major cuts and terminations in these
>proposed rescissions.  This is just the first step in a concerted campaign
>to slash deeper and terminate additional programs in the FY 1996 budget.
>An immediate and strong reaction from library supporters is critical, and
>will have an impact.  Grassroots action could help in the House, and could
>have even more of an impact in the Senate.
>
>Call your Representative's local office, or call the Washington office of
>any Representative or Senator through the Capitol switchboard (202-225-3121
>for House offices, 202-224-3121 for Senate offices).  More than 50
>Representatives and a small number of Senators have email addresses.  A
>House directory of email address can be located on the Internet via the
>World Wide Web at http://www.house.gov. under Who's Who and How Do I
>Contact Them or by gopher to gopher.house.gov.  The Senate has not yet made
>its members' address available through the Internet.
>
>Ask if your legislator would help to oppose the rescissions.  Please send
>immediate feedback on the position of your legislator to the ALA Washington
>Office at 202-547-4440 or fax to 202-547-7363 or email to [log in to unmask]
>
>WHAT'S THE IMPACT OF THESE CUTS?  Here are some examples of the problems
>the rescissions would cause for specific library programs.  Use any of
>these points, buttressed by local or state examples, in your contacts with
>legislators.
>
>LSCA II PUBLIC LIBRARY CONSTRUCTION AND TECHNOLOGY ENHANCEMENT.  This
>particular rescission would be highly unprecedented and unfair because some
>states have already received LSCA II funds for FY95.  LSCA II is a state
>formula grant program, but states must have local project applications with
>matching funds committed before applying to receive the state's share of
>appropriations.  Because of the nature of construction projects, funds can
>be carried over to the following fiscal year, and the rate at which LSCA II
>funds are paid out is slower than for LSCA I and III.
>
>Five states or territories (Massachusetts, Nevada, Oregon, Rhode Island,
>and the Virgin Islands) have already received all their LSCA II funds for
>FY95.  Another handful of states will receive all or most of their funds
>within the next few days.  All other states would be unjustly penalized
>through withdrawal of their funds under the rescission proposal.  In the
>past, rescissions have rarely been proposed for state formula grant
>programs where awards have already been made to some states.
>
>LSCA VI LIBRARY LITERACY PROGRAM.  This program awards competitive grants
>directly to public and state libraries for library literacy projects.  The
>proposed rescission is not just a cut, but a complete termination of a
>program where proposals are pending and peer review has already taken
>place.  Combined with the additional $46 million in other literacy program
>terminations, the result would be $54 million less spent in helping adults
>to become literate productive members of society.
>
>HEA II-B LIBRARY EDUCATION/TRAINING.  Grants would be made in May to
>graduate library schools for fellowships and to eligible awardees for
>training institutes.  The Higher Education Act title II-B program helps
>recruit students to library science in areas of shortages such as
>children's librarians and technology, and helps recruit minorities to the
>field.  Many library school faculty receive their doctorates through II-B
>assistance.  Currently, 76 doctoral students would be cut off in mid-
>fellowship; many left jobs on the assumption that their fellowships would
>continue.
>
>HEA II-B LIBRARY RESEARCH/DEMONSTRATIONS.  The proposed rescission of all
>$6.5 million in Higher Education Act II-B library demonstration funds is
>not possible, because $5 million of these funds have already been spent in
>two recent awards (to Iowa and West Virginia) of $2.5 million each for
>demonstrations of online access to statewide multitype library
>bibliographic databases using fiber optic networks.  The remaining $1.5
>million is to be awarded in May for a demonstration project making federal
>information and other databases available for public use by connecting a
>multistate consortium of public and private colleges and universities to a
>public library and an historic library.
>
>***************************************************************************
>***************************************************************************
>
>ALAWON (ISSN 1069-7799) is an irregular publication of the American Library
>Association Washington Office, 110 Maryland Avenue, N.E., Washington, DC
>20002-5675.  Internet: [log in to unmask]; Phone: 202-547-4440;
>Fax: 202-547-7363.  Contributing to this issue:  Carol C. Henderson;
>Editor: Lynne E. Bradley ([log in to unmask]).
>
>ALAWON is available free of charge and is available only in electronic
>form.  To subscribe, send the message "subscribe ala-wo [your name]" to
>listserv@uicvm (Bitnet) or [log in to unmask] (Internet).  Back issues
>and other documents are available from the list server.  To find out what's
>available, send the message "send ala-wo filelist" to the listserv.  The
>ALA-WO filelist contains the list of files with the exact filename and
>filetype.  To get a particular file, issue the command "send filename
>filetype" to the listserv.  Do not include the quotes in your commands.
>
>All materials in the newsletter subject to copyright by the American
>Library Association may be reprinted or redistributed for noncommercial
>purposes with appropriate credits.  For other reprinting or redistribution,
>address requests to the ALA Washington Office ([log in to unmask]).
>
>***************************************************************************
>***End of file******************End of file******************End of file***
 
 
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Rich Jones                              Governing Board For:
Development Director                    Carter House Natural Science Museum
Shasta Natural Science Association      Redding Arboretum By The River
[log in to unmask]              SNSA Environmental Resources Center

ATOM RSS1 RSS2