Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 5 Jan 1995 11:34:16 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>Eric...I usually quite enjoy your insightful (sometimes sarcastic)
...
>"non-professional" request for information. First, the term indoctrination
>is an unfortunate one to use for any profession. A sense of professionalism
>with fine basic skills and academic background is hardly indoctrination.
...
>Jane
The term "indoctrination" wasn't introduced into the discussion by Eric
Siegel; it was mine. And I said, as near as I can remember, " ... I'm
almost tempted to use the word 'indoctrination' " or words to that effect.
I was aware of the connotation of the word -- ie. "imbue with a usu.
partisan or sectarian opinion, point of view, or principle" (Webster's New
Collegiate 1973), usually used in a rather negative way, hence my
hesitation. I was afraid that the negative use of the word might be
assumed.
The primary meaning is still "to instruct esp. in fundamentals or
rudiments" -- and that was what I was aiming at, although I might argue
that indoctrination into the ways of museum professionalism is not in and
of itself negative.
Although I feel somewhat guilty for having sparked some irritation, I am
not at all sorry I launched the topic. Response has been quite
interesting, especially from the point of view of a librarian.
Mario Rups
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|