Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 7 Jul 1994 10:09:54 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Wed, 6 Jul 1994, Matthews, J wrote:
> I am researching the cost/benefit arguments made by museums for mounting publi
c
> access point ssuch as a Freenet presence. Has enough time passed that Australi
a,
> BC, Cleveland, Dallas, et al have evaluated, justified or revised resource
> implications/allocations?
> Would this be a good case study for next AAM?
Julia,
I think this would be a great AAM session topic. We need to look at what
is effective and what isn't in the online environment, and more
importantly, develop measures for success. What makes a good online site?
Are you going to propose it? I'd be willing to help.
I would add the National Museum of American Art to the list, as they have
been very successful [numerically] with their America Online presence.
jennifer
J. Trant
Manager, Getty AHIP Imaging Initiative
[log in to unmask] AKA [log in to unmask]
|
|
|