Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 14 Dec 1994 11:33:23 EST |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Brett/David,
I was really surprised that an institution like CW was
going to require drug testing. Surprised, and a bit alarmed.
I think this is a very dangerous trend in a "free" society and
one that I would oppose as vigorously as I could. It could,
under certain conditions, be legitimized (flight safety?), but
otherwise begins to sound Orwellian. I am not a lawyer but it
seems like there are real issues inherent in this that run to
the due process clauses of the 1st and 14th Amendments.
Museum drug testing? Requiring a speciman from the
curator of specipersons! I would be curious as to what
rationale is being offered for this? Reckless operation of an
audio cassette tour? Holding invertebrate fossils hostage?
Misuse of calcium-removing acids? Violation of an ATF permit
for a still? Sniffing the residual resin in the pine seat of a
windsor chair? Over-dusting of the snuff box display? Surely
you jest!
But humor may be inappropriate. This does appear to be
part of a larger trend in the workplace that isn't at all funny.
I think we could/should look to AAM/VAM for leadership here;
that, and/or is there any kind of
association/union/representative group for museum employees?
Clearly these institutions are serious about this and, without
organized opposition, the individual employee will continue to
be clobbered.
These are my thoughts--comments, anyone?
John B. Bunch
Associate Professor
University of Virginia
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|