Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 30 Dec 1994 19:19:47 PDT |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In article <[log in to unmask]>, <[log in to unmask]> writes:
> Path:
kaiwan.kaiwan.com!news.claremont.edu!nntp-server.caltech.edu!library.ucla.edu!i
hnp4.ucsd.edu!sdd.hp.com!news.cs.indiana.edu!lynx.unm.edu!argo.unm.edu!not-for-
mail
> From: [log in to unmask] (jeffrey floyd stevens)
> Newsgroups: bit.listserv.museum-l,alt.artcom,rec.arts.fine
> Subject: Print Restoring Nightmare!
> Date: 30 Dec 1994 18:05:21 -0700
> Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque
> Lines: 10
> Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: argo.unm.edu
> Xref: kaiwan.kaiwan.com bit.listserv.museum-l:2031 alt.artcom:4837
rec.arts.fine:9316
>
> Since everyone was so helpful in giving me print framing and hinging
> information (thanks to all!), I thought I'd challenge you with this new
> scenario. While speding Xmas at my future mother-in-law's, we unframed a
> lithograph from the late fifties to reframe. Well, what a mess! It
> turns out that the people who did the frame glued the entire print to the
> supporting matboard. After examination, it looked like they used some
> sort of contact paper to fix the drawing (you can see onion-skin-like
> paper peeking out from the edges of the print). Sooooo, what are the
> options for removing this print from the matboard and then reframing?
> Good luck to all, and thanks. Jeff
Is the print valuable? If so, I would take it to a conservator ( a good
listing is available from the American Institute of Conservation in
Washington DC); they can reverse the adhesive without inflicting any more
damage on the print. If it says "Sam Francis" in the corner, that's the
route I would take :).
Ralph Roessler / Paper Technologies, Inc. (800) 727-3716
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|