MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Object documentation
From:
Sue Maltby <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 28 Jan 1994 17:36:47 -0500
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]> from "Wayne E. Wakefield" at Jan 28, 94 03:25:10 pm
Reply-To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (8 lines) 
In reply to your question about appropriate documentation I must say
that as a conservator I feel that documentation is not complete if
condition reports and treatment documentation do not stay with the
artifact.  Our live's would be made a lot easier if museum objects
came with good treatment records.
 
Susan L. Maltby

ATOM RSS1 RSS2