Sender: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 25 Jan 2007 19:35:31 -0500 |
Content-Disposition: |
inline |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
It is my understanding that OnmiPage is the industry leader. Two
years ago I used it to do some OCR on materials from an archive with
mixed results. It worked perfectly when I was converting a high
quality image with clear letters. Unfortunately, the majority of my
documents were frustrating. I had mimeographs with fuzzy letters that
resulted in errors (O, G, C, and Q were substituted, for example).
Photocopies from microfilm were a problem too because they tended to
have extra little black specks and scratches. A spec could be
interpreted as the dot on an i and a scratch could ruin an entire
word. If your manuscript is clean then I certainly recommend buying
Omni, but if not then you may want to save your money.
Travis
=========================================================
Important Subscriber Information:
The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).
If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).
|
|
|