Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 5 Sep 2006 09:10:15 -0400 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Specifying a required minimum number of years' experience is
discriminatory against young people? I find this incomprehensible.
Julia Muney Moore
Public Art Administrator
Blackburn Architects, Indianapolis, IN
(317) 875-5500 x230
-----Original Message-----
From: Museum discussion list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Jim Roberts
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 5:37 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [MUSEUM-L] Age discrimination legislation (UK)
...
Advertising phrases such as "5 years management experience" or even "10
years experience" or "would suit an older person" will be regarded as
discriminatory; the first two on the basis that a recent graduate or
youn
g
applicant has not had time to gain years of experience.
The more obvious "We are looking for a young person to join our dynamic
team" is plainer and easier to discern, but employing on the basis of
experience, training, qualifications, life choices might all be seen as
indirectly discrimatory.
=========================================================
Important Subscriber Information:
The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).
If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).
|
|
|