Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 1 Apr 2006 11:06:23 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Fiona Cameron at the University of Sydney and Lynda Kelly of the
Australian Museum organized research and a symposium on this question a
couple of years ago, some of which I believe was published.
Their web site from that project is still up and includes a
bibliography:
http://amonline.net.au/amarc/contested/index.htm
-L.D.
On Mar 31, 2006, at 2:04 PM, Barbara Case wrote:
> A question particularly for regional art museums:
>
> We are dealing with how best to address issues of controversy in our
> exhibitions, particularly as we are trying to attract new community
> audiences who may be inexperienced art museum visitors. Can you share
> whether you shy away from controversy in your exhibition or program
> selection, particularly since the culture wars of the last decade, or
> instances where you think you have handled controversy well or poorly?
> Thanks.
>
> Barbara
>
> Barbara Case
> Currier Museum of Art
> 201 Myrtle Way
> Manchester, NH 03104
> 603.669.6144 ext 131
> [log in to unmask]
=========================================================
Important Subscriber Information:
The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).
If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).
|
|
|