Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 7 Apr 2006 16:30:09 -0400 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="windows-1252" |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hello,
My name is Bill Jeffers and I am a graduate student researching stolen
Nazi art. Basically I see only two choices when it comes to this. They
are 1. Give the piece of art back to the rightful heirs or 2. Fight the
accusation. I was wondering if anyone out there had any experiences or
information that can help me weigh the pros and cons of each choice. I do
feel that if it can be proven that a piece of art and/or an object in a
collection was indeed acquired by the Nazis and therefore stolen, it should
be returned to the heir as soon as that fact can be established. Even if
the piece is the "crown jewel" of your collection. Keeping it regardless
will have serious consequenses down the road (public perception, declining
attendance, donations [both monetary and object], etc). Thank you for your
time in this matter.
Sincerely,
Bill Jeffers
[log in to unmask]
=========================================================
Important Subscriber Information:
The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).
If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).
|
|
|