In a message dated 4/12/2005 9:45:03 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
<< The best thing I can say without seeing the photos is that further
preventative measures are in order. The photo should be placed in a
mylar sleeve (as long as it can be stored in an area of low humidity
below 80%) and stored flat. If in a mylar sleeve within an acid-free
album, the curl might work itself out. The curl developed because the
photo was not stored flat and supported. The backing needs further
support. >>
I think this advice is applicable only if we're talking about minor curling,
whereas the humidification advice offered by others is useful for severe
curling--as in rolled up in a tight cylindrical form, which was often done
deliberately with panoramic prints as well as other unmounted prints. However, the
suggestion that a few hours in a homemade, two-container humidification chamber
will suffice varies from my experience; I've found that it usually takes a
couple of days, and you have to be careful to avoid promoting mold growth on the
prints--inspect periodically and remove to flatten between blotters under
evenly distributed weights only when they are pliable and "relaxed." The worst
thing you can do is to try to unroll photographs when they're too stiff,
especially if they're on heavy, double-weight paper, as they may literally break or
crack. If the curled or rolled photographs are already cracked or torn, you
may need a conservator's help.
Some photographers have recently suggested a more aggressive approach,
steaming rolled or curled photographs over hot water, as the humidification will be
much more rapid. I haven't tried it and don't know how safe it is.
Incidentally, a few years ago I chanced to read in "Hints from Heloise" a
reader's suggestion that rolling up family snapshots and placing them in
cardboard cores from paper towels would be a dandy way to "preserve" your photographs.
That was so wrong in so many ways I could hardly believe it: first, storing
photographs that way would take up so much more space than simply storing them
flat that it would be wildly impractical, but more importantly, the acidic
cardboard could do damage, extracting them from the tube without tearing them
would be a devilish proposition, and in a few years--or even months--you'd have a
set of tightly rolled prints that would need to be flattened. I couldn't
resist writing a heated protest against such an absurd idea, but of course it was
never published.
David Haberstich
=========================================================
Important Subscriber Information:
The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).
If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).
|