Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 15 Apr 2005 11:33:21 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Christie,
I'm not sure what you're trying to accomplish by removing one of your two
fields. Is it to reduce confusion? In my experience, more database fields
are generally better, provided that you have clear documentation about
what information goes where. Lots of examples generally help, too.
The minimum standard (per Spectrum http://www.mda.org.uk/speclic.htm) is
that an object be given both an Object Name (or a Title, in your example)
as well as a Brief Physical Description, which could be used to 'name'
items in addition to the titles provided by their creators. As an example:
Title: Mona Lisa
Desc: Oil Painting
In addition, we use a Nomenclature field (using the Getty AAT) to make it
easier for users of our object database to find things by subject or
category.
Hope that helps!
======================================
Andrew Schuricht
Springs Preserve, Las Vegas
=========================================================
Important Subscriber Information:
The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).
If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).
|
|
|