Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - MUSEUM-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
MUSEUM-L Home MUSEUM-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Whiteout
From:
"Patricia V. Podzorski" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 31 Aug 1994 08:34:16 PDT
Reply-To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
        Regarding the issue of using whiteout as a base for marking
specimens.
 
        No "empirical" study, but as an student working on a site in
eastern Oregon some years go, we marked basalt metates which were left
in situ with whiteout and sealed with clear nail polish.
 
        The next year, when we came back to the site, the whiteout spots
had popped off of several of the metates.  To me that seemed proof enough
that, in the long run, even in controlled conditions there was a shelf
life for whiteout.
 
Patricia Podzorski
Phoebe A. Hearst Museum
UC Berkeley

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV