Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 6 Nov 2003 21:44:13 -0500 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
During the period of slavery in America, the most common term I've seen for
enslaved persons is not "slaves", it's another term, a word beginning with
"n".
If you want to stay entirely within the context of the era, that word would
be appropriate. But today that's quite offensive, and I doubt that few of us
would advocate its use. I teach this era (also have developed exhibits on
the topic) and I generally do say "people who were enslaved" and I discuss
why - because it reminds us that they were people who had this status
applied to them, but it was not their unalienable identity. Sometimes I also
use "slaves", sometimes I say "enslaved Africans" (for the earliest
periods), sometimes "African Americans, enslaved and free" or "free blacks"
or "black folk".... all depending on the shades of meaning I'm aiming for.
If a direct quote has the "n" word in it, I'll read it, but with a
disclaimer that it's the term of the time... if I used it in exhibit
material, I'd use it only in a quote and with a disclaimer also.
But "enslaved people"? Use it all the time, nothing wrong with it.
Carol Ely, Ph.D.
Museum Consultant, Louisville
=========================================================
Important Subscriber Information:
The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).
If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).
|
|
|