We could also be overthinking this a little bit.
I too have struggled with the terminology for years, having an anthropology
background, a deep love of historical collections, and a job as an art
museum registrar.
The artifact/specimen typology is definitely a little too imprecise in some
circumstances, but functional none the less. Why mess with it by throwing
in terms we are just going to have to explain/define to everone. If the
caveat for using a given term can change from item to item, then it is
useless.
I personally prefer to leave it simple for the major fields, then add the
specific information/classifications in other more apropriate places.
"Artifact" and "specimen" should cover all object needs, in terms of basic
classification, since everything should fall into those two broad
categories, and everything is technically an object. You can then get as
specific as you want in specialized fields.
Mark Janzen
Registrar/Collections Manager
Edwin A. Ulrich Museum of Art
Martin H. Bush Outdoor Sculpture Collection
Wichita State University
(316)978-5850
"Simmons, John E"
<[log in to unmask]>
Sent by: Museum To
discussion list [log in to unmask]
<[log in to unmask] cc
SE.LSOFT.COM>
Subject
Re: Artifact: meaning
12/23/2003 03:51
PM
Please respond to
Museum discussion
list
<[log in to unmask]
SE.LSOFT.COM>
Concerning the use of artifact, object, and specimen--I have been thinking
about this issue for some time, and would appreciate comments on the
following proposal (my address is at the very end of this message).
The use of object and specimen is usually divided between biological
collections (specimens) and non-biological collections (object). So what
is the best word to use for the components of all collections? What about
artifact, or item, or thing?
We can rule out artifact as being specific to items made or modified by
human beings. We can rule out item as its use is too imprecise (distinct
part of a whole). We can eliminate specimen as being too Aristotelian or
typological, as it refers to a representative part of a whole. We can
eliminate thing because this use would be far from the original meaning,
and because it refers to something inanimate.
This leaves us with two interesting words, object and element. The
meaning of object is certainly adequate to the task, but it is carries with
it a certain amount of historical baggage as it has traditionally referred
to non-biological collections. The word element is much better. It means
a constituent part of a whole, which is what a component of any collection
is. It also has meaning in the sense of an element of a set, which is how
collections should be conceived of-as sets of elements [please see Simmons,
J.E. and Y. Muñoz-Saba. 2003. The theoretical bases of collections
management. Collection Forum 18(1-2):38-49].
As collections grow larger and more complex, we will see much greater use
of set theory in their management, so I suggest that we start using the
word element to refer to the component parts of collections in general, and
reserve the use of words such as artifact, object, and specimen to the
particular kinds of collections that they describe.
Some etymological background notes:
Artifact (artefact). "Anything made by human art and workmanship; an
artificial product." (OED). Perhaps a better definition for museum
purposes is a simple object showing human workmanship or modification.
Etymology: L arte (skill) and factum (to do). First recorded use was by
Coleridge in 1821, "The conception of all these, as realized in one and the
same artéfact, may be fairly entitled, the Ideal of an Ink-stand." (OED)
Element. "One of the simple substances of which all material bodies are
compounded" (OED). Best modern definition is a constituent part.
Etymology: From the Latin elementum (the original meaning of elementum is
uncertain). First recorded use 1724, "The chemist makes spirit, salt,
sulphur, water, and earth, to be their five elements" (OED).
Item. "A statement, maxim, or admonition such as was commonly introduced by
the word item; a saying with a particular bearing. Hence, generally, an
imitation, a hint." (OED). The second definition in the OED is "An article
or unit of any kind included in an enumeration, computation, or sum
total..." Can also refer to one of the distinct parts of a whole.
Etymology: From the Latin ita (thus). First recorded use in 1578, "The
lawe layeth no Item to youre charge." (OED)
Object. "A statement thrown in or introduced in opposition; an
objection... Something 'thrown' or put in the way, so as to interrupt or
obstruct the course of a person or thing; an obstacle, a
hindrance...Something placed before the eyes, or presented to the sight or
other sense; an individual thing seen or perceived..." (OED). Usually
defined as something capable of being seen, touched, or otherwise sensed.
Etymology: From the Latin objectum (thrown in the way). First recorded
use 1398, "e obiect of the eye is all t may be seen, & al t maye be herde
is object to the herynge" (OED).
Specimen. "A means of discovering or finding out; an experiment...A
pattern or model" (OED). Usually means a part typical of a group or whole,
or something that belongs in a particular category.
Etymology: Latin specere (to look at). First recorded use 1619, "Our
Resurrection shall be like or Saviour's: His and ours make a mutual Aspect;
His the Specimen, and ours the Complement" (OED).
Thing. "A meeting, assembly, esp. a deliberative or judicial assembly, a
court, a council... II. An entity of any kind. That which exists
individually" (OED). Best definition is probably a spatial entity, an
inanimate object.
Etymology: Goth theihs (time). First recorded use ca. 888.
John E. Simmons
Collection Manager, Natural History Museum & Biodiversity Research Center
and
Coordinator, Museum Studies Program
University of Kansas
Dyche Hall
1345 Jayhawk Boulevard
Lawrence, Kansas 66045-7561
Telephone 785-864-4508
FAX 785-864-5335
[log in to unmask]
www.nhm.ku.edu/herpetology/
www.ku.edu/~museumst/
=========================================================
Important Subscriber Information:
The Museum-L FAQ file is located at
http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed
information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail
message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should
read "help" (without the quotes).
If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to
[log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff
Museum-L" (without the quotes).
=========================================================
Important Subscriber Information:
The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).
If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).
|
