Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 10 Sep 2003 12:40:05 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
This is a question my education coordinator asked that I pose to the group:
With more and more documents/photographs/images of objects from a museum
collection posted to the web, students have begun to cite them as primary
sources in their research. For example, a student may use a letter written
by an historic person and found on a web-site - an image of the letter is
there as well as a full transcription. Since it is only a digital copy and
not the original, would it still be considered a primary source? What if
only a transcription was provided, and not the image? If you have some
insight into this, or just a good opinion, please respond to Brian Banton at
[log in to unmask] Thanks!
Kate Higgins
Curator
Pejepscot Historical Society
159 Park Row
Brunswick, ME 04011
207-729-6606
207-729-6012 (fax)
=========================================================
Important Subscriber Information:
The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).
If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).
|
|
|