Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 3 Apr 2003 21:45:21 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
The fact of the matter is that the rate at which technology is changing is
precisely the thing you should be considering as you decide what to collect.
I was curator responsible for technology collections at two museums, and in
the end, I settled on the idea that I would document the technology that was
important to MY geographic area. If there were hardware businesses in my
state, then we would look at collecting significant pieces. I know that
there are museums that are making it their business to deal with technology.
They are better equipped to do it than most run-of-the-mill museums.
I also question the value of static technology pieces. I'm not sure that,
with the possible exception of the gigantic room-size and supercomputers of
the past, a single pc sitting silently in a museum exhibit says much. And
I'm not sure the extent to which we can fire up all of these babies in a
gallery space.
Go back to your mission, and then collect accordingly.
Good luck!
Claudia Nicholson
former Curator-of-Everything-Else
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kevin MacLean" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 5:33 PM
Subject: Question re. computers & contemporary collecting
> Our institution is soliciting advice in order to decide what course of
> action it should take with regard to accessioning future technology
> collections.
>
> Past (pre- '97) curatorial thinking was that the our facility should limit
> technology collecting due to the rate at which it evolves and its
potential
> to dominate shrinking storage space. Existing thought, however, is that
> technology, predominately computers, have an important place in our
cultural
> collections. In addition, technologies are valued only as long as they
> cutting edge, which was yesterday, with the result that objects (eg. game
> systems) are quickly disposed of in favour of the faster, more impressive
> ones. The question is where do we draw the line?
>
> What is the viewpoint of your facility re. contemporary collecting? Do
you
> have a cut-off date re. contemporary collecting and how would you approach
> the processing of a large computer collection? Do you have a policy
solely
> related to collecting the technologies which have dominated the last 25
> years.
>
> Good luck answering. Kevin
>
> =========================================================
> Important Subscriber Information:
>
> The Museum-L FAQ file is located at
http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed
information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message
to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help"
(without the quotes).
>
> If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to
[log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff
Museum-L" (without the quotes).
=========================================================
Important Subscriber Information:
The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).
If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).
|
|
|