Believe me the exhibit itself should be enough to copyright the exhibit.  Just because it is taken down does not effect this.  What is important however is that you really do not have to register a copyright unless you are bringing an action in court.  You recieve copyright
protection once it is in tangible form.  If you are going to register the exhibit you are correct that some record of it must be submitted.   BUt registering the exhibit it probably a waste of time and resources, I can see almost no reason to do so.

As for who would own the exhibit, that is a work for hire argument and should be left for another day since explaining it can cause headaches.  And I also like Brian Dennehy.


Steven Bush

Albert Sperath wrote:

> Steven Bush wrote:
>
> >I think that the exhibit it self is a tangible form.  I do not think you
> >need to write out >the design or anything, a tangible form is a tangible
> >form.
>
> I respectfully disagree. The exhibition I pictured was a temporary one even
> if a long term installation and will eventually disappear. Without a
> tangible document like a plan, file or photographs there will be no
> evidence of it for ©. To register it in Washington it there must be
> tangible evidence submitted with the application.
>
> Adrienne DeAngelis wrote:
>
> >Exhibitions are the work of many people, usually both
> >inside and outside of the exhibiting insititution.  To whom would such a
> >copyright on the whole exhibition belong?
>
> My understanding is it would be the museum that they work for. Regardless
> of whether they were in the direct employ of the museum or  contract
> designers (work for hire).
>
> >Finally, what earthly purpose would be served by trying to
> >copyright an entire exhibition?
>
> The original question from Pamela Feltus was:
>
> >Has anyone ever had, or heard of, an exhibit copyrighted or anything like
> >that for the protection of intellectual property?
>
> The answer is simply yes it can be ©ed and Ms. Feltus can tell us what
> brought this inquiry to the list.
>
> >It would seem that Mr. Sperath has seen
> >"The Belly of an Architect" (where an exhibition planned by one man is
> >hijacked by others in a money-laundering scheme) too many times.
>
> BTW, Brian Dennehy is one of my favorite actors and it is impossible to see
> his films too many  times.
>
> Respectfully submitted,
>
> Albert Sperath
>
> Albert Sperath, Director
> University Art Galleries
> Murray State University
> 604 Fine Arts Center
> Murray KY 42071-3342
>
> 270.762.6734 voice
>               3920 fax
>
> This is a personal message.  The views expressed in this message are solely
> those of the sender and are not to be attributed to the owner of the
> sender's domain, the sender's employer or any other person.
>
> Important Subscriber Information:
>
> The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).
>
> If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).

=========================================================
Important Subscriber Information:

The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).

If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).