Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 3 Aug 2000 11:17:29 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Not to re-open old wounds, but it was my impression that Giuliani initially
objected to some of the imagery in the show rather than the show's ethical
implications. The ethics of the process only came in as an issue after art
professionals "explained" the objectionable image, and after concerns about
Giuliani's wishing to use the show as a plank in his campaign platform came
to the fore.
I do agree that the AAM's position on the ethics of the show is correct in
theory; however, since any artwork in a private collection may eventually
enter the market, we should take care in practice that, in the name of
ethics, we do not totally disregard fine private or corporate collections
when looking for exhibition opportunities. Many of us do not have the clout
to borrow works from well-known museums, and private collections are a good
resource for us in our educational efforts. Where should the line be drawn:
dollar amounts? Value of artwork? Size of museum?
Julia Moore
Director of Exhibitions and Artist Services
Indianapolis Art Center
=========================================================
Important Subscriber Information:
The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).
If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).
|
|
|