MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
John Burke <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 26 Oct 1994 09:05:35 -0700
Comments:
Warning -- original Sender: tag was [log in to unmask]
Organization:
CRL Dialup Internet Access (415) 705-6060 [Login: guest]
Reply-To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Kate Roberts ([log in to unmask]) wrote:
: Vapour phase corrosion inhibitors - has anyone used them successfully for
: the storage of iron objects indoors?Any information gratefully received.Kate
: Roberts
 
Problems with vapor phase inhibitors are both human toxicity and the need to
maintain a sealed environment for effectiveness.  If the environment can be
sealed, relative humidty control with silica gel or even the use of non-
oxygen atmospheres may be possible too.
 
One idea we have been looking into is the use of vapor barrier plastics (like
Marvelseal) to create pouches for iron objects.  Before the bag is sealed, it
could be flushed with nitrogen or argon, and an oxygen scavenger (Ageless)
enclosed.  The additional use of conditioned silica gel or organic scavengers
(activated charcoal, permanganate beads) may not be necessary.
 
Hope this isn't too technical.  It just points to hope for archaeological
materials.
 
John Burke
Head Conservator
The Oakland Museum of California

ATOM RSS1 RSS2