Gary,

Thank you for your efforts in tackling a difficult and sometimes emotional
issue. I for one applaud your efforts and agree that the definitions has to
be broadened.  It should also get away from the current ICOM definition
with an add on list of other less pure institutions that are deemed to
qualify as museums for whatever reason.

What is the primary reason behind coming up with a definition? Is it to
limit or expand membership in ICOM? Is it to "guarantee" the validity of an
institution as a museum so that it might qualify for funding? The reason
for this question is that the purpose should shape the outcome; a bit of
the "form follows function" approach.

I would argue that:
      A collection is not a given.
            Typically, science centres, some of which use museum in their
name, do not typically hold collections. Similarly, childrens' museums and
virtual museums do not hold collection. If a "museum" held one object would
it be a collection or do we need to have a minimum number?
      Research is not a given.
            Many local museums, smaller museums, etc. do not have the funds
or qualified staff to undertake research but are trying their best to
preserve objects.
      Nonprofit is not a given.
            Some museums/science centres, etc., have to generate revenue.
They could be a public institution that is mandated to show a profit or
close.
      Public (as opposed  to Private) is not a given.
            Private museums, some open to the public, do exist.

In my view, museums should exist to serve the public, not to serve a
collection. That being said, if the museum was closed to the public but
still had a collection and did research would it still be a museum?
Reluctantly, I would have to respond "yes" but it would be a museum without
real meaning or purpose.

I have argued these points before as a member of the Canadian Museum
Association, Canadian Association of Science Centres, and CIMUSET. Thus far
I have convinced neither science centre nor museum advocates to broaden
their perspective.

Good luck.

Paul Donahue
President, CIMUSET



                      Gary Edson
                      <[log in to unmask]        To:       [log in to unmask]
                      DU>                      cc:
                      Sent by:                 Subject:  Definition of a Museum
                      International
                      Council of
                      Museums
                      Discussion List
                      <[log in to unmask]
                      .LSOFT.COM>


                      07/10/2003 10:50
                      AM
                      Please respond to
                      International
                      Council of
                      Museums
                      Discussion List






Colleagues:

The following is one of the definition that has been suggested. What are
your thoughts  about this idea. Does it adequately describe a "museum," or
is it too broad, too limiting, too inclusive, or too exclusive?


A MUSEUM IS AN EDUCATIONAL ORGANIZATION THAT SERVES THE PUBLIC BY
INTERPRETING SCIENTIFIC, CULTURAL AND/OR NATURAL HERITAGE THROUGH
THE USE OF A PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT AND OFTEN OBJECTS. MUSEUMS THAT
HOLD COLLECTIONS CARE FOR THEM AS A PUBLIC TRUST AND PRESERVE THEM
FOR THE FUTURE.

Gary Edson

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Change ICOM-L subscription options, unsubscribe, and search the
archives at:  http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/icom-l.html

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Change ICOM-L subscription options, unsubscribe, and search the
archives at:  http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/icom-l.html