Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 28 Feb 2000 11:59:16 -0700 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
The subject of Committee membership has now arisen and it has been pointed
out that it is of no use to be a non-voting member since one does not
receive anything in return unless the Committee continues to send
information to non-voting members.
I am in favour of expanding the possibilities for voting members and the use
of the internet but not to charge only those who do not have e-mail. ICOM
could permit voting membership in more than one Committee (2?) for the basic
membership fee and also allow members to sign up for additional voting or
non-voting memberships for an additional fee. I'm sure there are ways of
encouraging use of e-mail for those who have it. My concern with the
mailing charge is that, once again, we favour those who have the resources
and charge more to those that don't. I hope that we can feel comfortable as
individuals paying for additional committee memberships AND use our e-mail
to help keep down the costs.
Thanks
Lois Irvine
----- Original Message -----
From: Per Rekdal <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2000 4:13 AM
Subject: Re: E-mail utilization
> Cary Karp wrote:
>
> >Quoting Per Rekdal:
> >
> >> The real challenge for ICOM now is to make members who do
> >> have an e-mail address to report it to the ICOM Secretariat,
> >> AND make the ICOM Secretariat start using the advantages of
> >> electronic mail more fully.
> >
> >Instead of using ICOM-L to register a plea for the Secretariat to
> >register a plea to the membership to report their e-mail
> >addresses to the Secretariat so that the Secretariat can try to
> >figure out how to use the info to better advantage, why not
> >simplify things?
> >
> ... Neither this, nor any alternative scheme, can be
> >realized without individual ICOM members assuming full
> >responsibility for their own participancy.
> >
>
> I have suggested to the ICOM Secretariat (through this List, which I know
> they read) that they should launch a very visible campaign through ICOM
> News (or perhaps through the National Committees?) in order to make ICOM
> members register their e-mail-addresses to the Secretariat and I think I
> have also suggested that the excistence of this List is properly and also
> very visibly made known through ICOM News. I do not expect the Secretariat
> to respond immediately to such proposals, but I do hope that messages on
> the List about the importance of using more electronic and (when not
> ncessary) less paper media, will be followed up in the manner the
> Secretariat finds most functional. And I do not see appeals to use more
> electronic communication as a critisism of the Secretariat. On the
> contrary! They do a very good job with limited means!
>
> Per B. Rekdal
>
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> Change ICOM-L subscription options and search the archives at:
> http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/icom-l.html
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Change ICOM-L subscription options and search the archives at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/icom-l.html
|
|
|