Steven Nowlin wrote: >This always happens -- it's the Law of Inverse Public Relations from >Censorhip -- the more you censor something, the more exposure you provide >it. So far as I can tell from a distance, the Brooklyn Museum invited the censorship as a way to promote its exhibit. It did so in its own advertising and promotion -- by telling everyone within driving distance that it had a titillating and probably offense exhibit and then named it "Sensational." Do museum professionals have in our Code of Ethics some "right" to act as flamboyant advance people for a circus? Ross Weeks Jr. Tazewell VA. ========================================================= Important Subscriber Information: The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ museum-l.html. You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes). If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).