Regarding this so-called "oversite" of bathroom and parking facilities, there seems to be something wrong with this picture. Providing adequate bathrooms and parking should not be something a major new museum building in a major city should be allowed to "overlook." Did the planners and those who were signing off on the plans have their heads stuck in holes in the ground? I wouldn't be surprised if women decide to overtake the mens rooms in desperation and in being thoroughly disgusted at the long lines. Potty parity! Could someone explain why this really happened and who was asleep at the wheel? ---------- From: Paul Apodaca[SMTP:[log in to unmask]] Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 1998 1:20 PM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: Getty "oversight"? Intriguingly, I was at a meeting two and half years ago at the California African-American History Museum in Exposition Park wherein the Getty Foundation Pres., Harold Williams, told all of us that the Getty was going to be short on parking and facilities when it was to open. He informed us that the head of MCA Studios had looked over the plans for the new museum and compared them with their experience at Universal City and had immediately spotted the deficiency in plans versus visitor number goals. The ensuing problems with parking and facilities were therefore expected by the Getty planners and those of us involved in the meetings. Paul Apodaca