Aqualieb, Sorry about the delay. What you asked has been the hot topic on Sub-Arch periodically over the years. I have advocated the sale of 'surplus' artifacts as a way of financing new exploration, digs, preservation, and/or publication. I feel that it is in the best interests of both the archaeological and the general community to get the word, and the artifacts, out to as many people as possible. So much of our heritage is locked away and will never be seen by anyone other than the occasional researcher. At the same time funding is getting scarce, and costs are rising, for any new projects, preserving and displaying what has been found, and communicating to the public the results of our work. A change of paridigm is called for and, in my opinion, is long overdue. Far from a curse on archaeology, I feel that sales such as you propose are going to be the only new life blood for archaeology. With out such sales the only people involved in archaeology will be those of independent sources of income: in other words dilitantes. I am interested in the responses you received, tho I am willing to bet that you were castigated for even mentioning this sale idea. There are many in the field (and on this list) who privately agree, but are not about to commit professional suicide by publically saying that this is the way to try to save archaeology. Do not make a misstake: I do not advocate the rape and pillage that has taken place by treasure hunters interested only in profit. I do advocate and support the archaeologically sound excavations that offer surplus artifacts for sale as a way to finance the preservation, public display, public education, and public publishing of the results. Thank you Jayson R. Jones