Thanks to Kay Lancaster for words of wisdom, reason, and comfort on handicapped access. The detailed discussion is much appreciated, and corroborates my personal assumptions about the ADA or what I thought it should say--I just didn't know for certain, never having read it. Lawmakers are capable of making terrible, unfair mistakes, sometimes unconstitutional ones, as in the case of the federal honorarium ban--but sometimes they get it right. As for several sets of labels in an exhibit to accommodate people reading at different heights (or for whatever reason), this is sometimes unsatisfactory from the standpoint of cluttered design, but I like the idea of supplementary handouts, which are eminently doable in this age of computers and copiers, if your printing budget is limited. The printed booklets in various languages which were available in the Vermeer show in The Hague, for example, solved several problems in addition to the multi-lingual issue: they enabled everyone to read explanatory texts at a comfortable distance, and kept the traffic flowing more freely than lengthy wall labels. --David Haberstich