>You can either get cheap or good quality.  Color xeroxing is limited
>in size but the quality is good for something cheap.  Scanning has
>poor quality when enlarged.  Digital camera pictures still lack the
>quality of photographs.
>
There is a bit of a misconception here. Scanning is poor when you enlarge
from something that was scanned small for a small-size output. If you set
it up properly when you scan (ie, the proper resolution for the desired
final size) you can scan a small print and make a large output that has
excellent quality.

Cheap digital cameras still lack the quality of photographs; expensive ones
do not. You would be amozed at the amount of high-quality catalog
photography that is done digitally. Again, it all comes down to resolution
and storage capacity.

Personally. I'd opt for color xerox for your purposes.

Ivy Fleck Strickler                     Phone 215-895-1637
Drexel University                       Fax 215-895-4917
Nesbitt College of Design Arts          [log in to unmask]
Philadelphia, PA 19104

"Never forget that life is like a Fellini movie, and you're getting to see
it for free."