I am doing research on the Barnes Foundation in relation to eccentric wills, charitable intent, and the doctrine of cy pres/deviation. A few questions that I have not been able to find answers to: - Have any studies been done on Barnesian educational methods? - During the infamous tour of the collections of the Barnes Foundation, the Foundation was ordered by the court to "develop an appropriate and practical art education program to be conducted during the period of renovation." Does anyone have information regarding the program that was developed and how it related to Barnesian educational methods? - Richard Glanton, President of the Foundation for the past five years, completed his term at the end of 1995. Does anyone know if a new President has been appointed? If so, who? - Barnes stipulated in the by-laws of the Foundation that art works were to be viewed only in daylight, as the artist would have seen them in his/her studio. I have read about fiber optics which give maximum luminence to objects, but this technique of lighting does not replicate the ambience of daylight. Also, I have read of multi-tiered skylight systems which diffuse daylight throughout exhibit areas while reducing UV exposure, but this technique would take major renovation and, in the Barnes case, redesigning of an historical building. Are there any technological advances that can replicate "daylight" ambience without major renovation and that would still be free of the harmful presence of UV? Thank you for your help. Deborah Bain Museum Studies San Francisco State University