According to [log in to unmask]:

> Subject: Email Nondelivery Notice -- FAILED MESSAGE
> Subject: Re: hygrothermographs vs data loggers?
> To: [log in to unmask] (Multiple recipients of list MUSEUM-L)
>
> Rebecca -
>
> Have a read at two recent Commission on Preservation & Access
> publications, Donald K. Sebera, _Isoperms: An Environmental
> Management Tool_, June 1994, followed by James M. Reilly,
> Douglas W. Nishamura, and Edward Zinn, _New Tools for
> Preservation: Assessing Long-Term Environmental Effects on
> Library and Archives Collections_, November 1995. I believe
> that the texts of both are available at the CoOL Web site. The
> address of the Commission is 1400 i6th St., NW, Suite 740,
> Washington DC 20036-2217. As I have remarked elsewhere, the
> "data-logger vs. hygrothermograph" debate sometimes resembles
> the "latke vs. hamantash" debate, so these two publications may
> not definitively resolve your quandary. But they might help.
>
> "Hop Schweiz"
>