According to [log in to unmask]: > Subject: Email Nondelivery Notice -- FAILED MESSAGE > Subject: Re: hygrothermographs vs data loggers? > To: [log in to unmask] (Multiple recipients of list MUSEUM-L) > > Rebecca - > > Have a read at two recent Commission on Preservation & Access > publications, Donald K. Sebera, _Isoperms: An Environmental > Management Tool_, June 1994, followed by James M. Reilly, > Douglas W. Nishamura, and Edward Zinn, _New Tools for > Preservation: Assessing Long-Term Environmental Effects on > Library and Archives Collections_, November 1995. I believe > that the texts of both are available at the CoOL Web site. The > address of the Commission is 1400 i6th St., NW, Suite 740, > Washington DC 20036-2217. As I have remarked elsewhere, the > "data-logger vs. hygrothermograph" debate sometimes resembles > the "latke vs. hamantash" debate, so these two publications may > not definitively resolve your quandary. But they might help. > > "Hop Schweiz" >