For Amy in the smallest town in America, and any others who may be interested, the Post article you are referring to featured Peter Swales as the lead voice protesting the Library of Congress' proposed Freud exhibition. And while Swales does have a varied career past (including work in the entertainment industry -- for the Rolling Stones, I think?!), he has indeed received training in psychology. Nor did Swales act alone. He was the advocate for a petition of protestors (including psychologists, historians, etc.) who were not only protesting Freud's theories but the selection of Freud scholars chosen to research the exhibition. I was extremely relieved that the Post reported two days (front page, Style section 2/28/96) ago that the show has been rescheduled. The initial delay was, according to Library representatives, due to "lack of funds -- a $352,000 shortfall." The exhibition is scheduled to open in 1998 -- the intermediate time to be used to raise the addition funding necessary, or -- and this sounds strangely familiar -- plan for a smaller version of the exhibition. Amy -- if you would like a copy of this article, I'd be happy to foward one to you. As an aside, in addition to Freud's known writings, there is a publication which I plan to peruse that may shed some light on why Freud's theories are being to strongly contested. I apologize for not remembering the name of the author, but the title is something like "Inside the Freud Archives." Whether the information in this publication is true, the story behind it is a little sad. A Freud scholar, after gaining the confidence of Freud's decedents, was permitted access to unpublished papers and research materials. His product was a scathing criticism of most of Freud's basic theories. Best of luck! Michelle L. Craig American Psychological Assocation Traveling Psychology Exhibition [log in to unmask]