========================================== Paul J. Johnson Insect Museum, Box 2207A South Dakota State University Brookings, South Dakota 57007 USA e-mail: [log in to unmask] ========================================== "By every conceivable measure, humanity is ecologically abnormal." - E.O. Wilson The Diversity of Life ------------------------------- Original Message ------------------------------- ----------------------------Original message---------------------------- As many of you know, the US govt (specifically the National Security Agency and the FBI) have introduced an encryption chip for use on the NII. However, this chip has a catch - they get to keep the keys so that they can listen in. Obviously, the raises real privacy concerns (see the Church Committee report on the NSA surveillance of American citizens for examples of their past activities). Computer security is another major concern. In the past year, there have been numerous stories of information from the FBI, IRS and SSA computers being sold to private detectives and others. Trusting the security of your communications and computers seems perhaps to be a bad idea. In response the public and private industry has overwhelmingly opposed the Clipper Proposal. Last week, many of the nations top cryptographers and computer security experts, experts on computer networks, privacy and public interest groups wrote to the president, asking him to withdrawl the proposal. Many others wanted to in in also. CPSR has created an internet petition drive. In the first 24 hours, over 1300 people have already signed on. We ask you to join in. Electronic Petition to Oppose Clipper Please Distribute Widely On January 24, many of the nation's leading experts in cryptography and computer security wrote President Clinton and asked him to withdraw the Clipper proposal. The public response to the letter has been extremely favorable, including coverage in the New York Times and numerous computer and security trade magazines. Many people have expressed interest in adding their names to the letter. In response to these requests, CPSR is organizing an Internet petition drive to oppose the Clipper proposal. We will deliver the signed petition to the White House, complete with the names of all the people who oppose Clipper. To sign on to the letter, send a message to: [log in to unmask] with the message "I oppose Clipper" (no quotes) You will receive a return message confirming your vote. Please distribute this announcement so that others may also express their opposition to the Clipper proposal. CPSR is a membership-based public interest organization. For membership information, please email [log in to unmask] For more information about Clipper, please consult the CPSR Internet Library - FTP/WAIS/Gopher CPSR.ORG /cpsr/privacy/crypto/clipper ===================================================================== The President The White House Washington, DC 20500 Dear Mr. President: We are writing to you regarding the "Clipper" escrowed encryption proposal now under consideration by the White House. We wish to express our concern about this plan and similar technical standards that may be proposed for the nation's communications infrastructure. The current proposal was developed in secret by federal agencies primarily concerned about electronic surveillance, not privacy protection. Critical aspects of the plan remain classified and thus beyond public review. The private sector and the public have expressed nearly unanimous opposition to Clipper. In the formal request for comments conducted by the Department of Commerce last year, less than a handful of respondents supported the plan. Several hundred opposed it. If the plan goes forward, commercial firms that hope to develop new products will face extensive government obstacles. Cryptographers who wish to develop new privacy enhancing technologies will be discouraged. Citizens who anticipate that the progress of technology will enhance personal privacy will find their expectations unfulfilled. Some have proposed that Clipper be adopted on a voluntary basis and suggest that other technical approaches will remain viable. The government, however, exerts enormous influence in the marketplace, and the likelihood that competing standards would survive is small. Few in the user community believe that the proposal would be truly voluntary. The Clipper proposal should not be adopted. We believe that if this proposal and the associated standards go forward, even on a voluntary basis, privacy protection will be diminished, innovation will be slowed, government accountability will be lessened, and the openness necessary to ensure the successful development of the nation's communications infrastructure will be threatened. We respectfully ask the White House to withdraw the Clipper proposal.