Michael,

Unfortunately ist is a non-profit board that answers to nobody, but I like your idea on bringing in an outsider to help educate. They might be willing to listen if they knew it wasn’t just me who was saying these things. Good idea. I will have to try that. 

-Rachael

On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Michael Rebman <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Rachael,

Is this a non-profit board that answers to nobody else?  Or is it a board that answers to a municipality or county government?  If the former, you could hopefully educate them or find an outsider who can explain best standards and practices.  If the latter, you could ask the municipal or county government for a new board, since the board is not allowing you to do your job and is posing a direct threat to the safety of the artifacts held in public trust.

Michael R.


On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Rachael Ward <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Hello All!

I am currently the director of a small historical society and museum where I am the first museum professional to be employed for their site. In a nut shell, there are no archival records of any sort, no collections room, collections policy, no provenance for a majority of the artifacts - essentially I’m starting from the ground up. Which, as trying as it is at times, isn’t why I’m writing to you all. 

The board of directors and I view the treatment of artifacts in drastically different manner. In the most recent scenario (and trust me when I say there are MANY scenarios), they came to me asking if they could use some of the artifacts (props as they termed them), on a float for local township parades. I explained that the artifacts could be harmed or stolen by exposing them to all the manner of variables a parade brings (rain, falling off a wagon and breaking, someone snatching the artifact when they weren’t looking), but they did not see the harm in this and continued to press the subject. I then tried to bring up other institutions and professional standards in the field of museums and let them know that it, quite frankly, is not acceptable, again not changing their minds. They ultimately have the final say and so I have expressed to them that I would respect their decisions regarding artifact usage outside the confines of museum, as is their right as the board. 

My question for you all is this: How do I convey to them that what they are choosing to do is harmful to the artifacts other than what I have already done? They claim to want to increase their professional standing in the museum community, but are unwilling to listen to my professional advice. I have had my fair share of ‘interesting’ situations regarding, shall we say, eccentric boards in my career, but this takes the cake. I’m at a loss on how to help them understand the ways of our field. Any advice on how you may have handled a similar situation would be greatly appreciated. I want to see this institution succeed, but right now that is looking rather bleak. 

--
Rachael Ward



To unsubscribe from the MUSEUM-L list, click the following link:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-HOME.exe?SUBED1=MUSEUM-L&A=1




--
Rachael Ward

Christian County Historical Society
Director
217.508.3557
www.linkedin.com/rachaelsapp

"History is no longer a spotlight. We are turning up the stagelights to show the entire cast.”
 -David McCullough


To unsubscribe from the MUSEUM-L list, click the following link:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-HOME.exe?SUBED1=MUSEUM-L&A=1