Jamin,
 
I believe you are referring to potential changes in incandescent light bulb (properly called "lamp" by lighting professionals) availability.  Please see the following link for more information.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phase-out_of_incandescent_light_bulbs  and also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Lighting_Energy_Policy  The PAR refers to "parabolic aluminized reflector" and is the type of bulb construction, not the type of lighting source (incandescent, fluorescent, LED, etc.).  The number refers to the diameter in 1/8s of an inch.  So, PAR 38 is 4.75 inches in diameter.  Please see this link for more information on PAR.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parabolic_aluminized_reflector_light 
 
Since the size and the design of the bulb are independent of the type of lighting source, you should still be able to use your fixtures if you want to.  The primary considerations (I apologize for redundancy with previous posts) are wattage versus light output [efficiency], color temperature of the light (generally 2800-6500 degrees kelvin, with daylight defined generally as between 5500 and 6500 degrees kelvin), color rendering accuracy of the bulb (CRI, with 100 exactly reproducing daylight at that color temperature), amount of ultraviolet light (UV) emitted, with virtually zero being ideal, and anticipated lifespan of the bulb.  Each type of lighting source has its advantages and disadvantages.  Most incandescents use a relatively high amount of energy, have low color temperature (reddish light), put out virtually no UV, and have a short lifespan.  Fluorescents are fairly efficient, have varying color temperatures, are generally poor in CRI, although there are some exceptions, emit a lot of UV light (this can be filtered with straight bulbs, but is very difficult with spiral bulbs), and have a moderately long lifespan, but their output drops off with hours of use.  LEDs are very high efficiency, currently can have varied color temperature, although earlier versions were very high (blue) historically, have had relatively poor CRI, and have high lifespan.  However, studies on LEDs show that their characteristics change with hours of use, and effective lifespans for museums are much shorter than advertised. 
 
You are correct that the technology is changing fast, and in a matter of months or a few years, the situation may have changed completely.  LEDs may be the future, but from most perspectives, they are not quite there yet for museum use.  However, with the phased-in nature of the changes (between 2012 and 2014 in the US), LED technology may be adequately improved by the time you need to buy replacement bulbs.  Or, another technology may be available.  BTW, the law does not require phasing out incandescents, but provides for increased efficiency standards, so it is possible they may still be available only more efficient, or, alternatively, manufacturers may stop making them if their efficiency can't be improved.  And, as I understand it, the law only applies to incandescents between 100 and 40 watts.  PAR 38s are likely to be available with different lighting sources even if the incandescent version is phased out.
 
The overall issues are much more complicated and nuanced than this response, so please do further research to fully understand the issues and possibilities.  Good luck!
 
Marc

American Conservation Consortium, Ltd.
     4 Rockville Road
     Broad Brook, CT 06016
     www.conservator.com
     860-386-6058
 
Marc A. Williams, President
     MS in Art Conservation, Winterthur Museum Program
     Former Chief Wooden Objects Conservator, Smithsonian Institution
     Fellow, American Institute for Conservation (AIC)
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: [log in to unmask] href="mailto:[log in to unmask]">Jamin Landavazo
To: [log in to unmask] href="mailto:[log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask]
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2012 12:42 PM
Subject: [MUSEUM-L] PAR lightbulb ban

Hello listers –

 

Our maintenance person just informed me of an e-mail he was sent regarding a ban on PAR lightbulbs – one of the types that we and presumably other museums use in track lighting fixtures for galleries.  The ban will go into effect on July 14th, 2012, after which no one will be able to manufacture these bulbs in the US.  Distributors will be allowed to sell their remaining stock.

 

My questions for the list – in the ever-changing world of museum lighting, what bulbs would you suggest to replace our current PAR 38s?  We will need to eventually replace about 350 throughout our galleries, so cost is an issue.  However, we are not completely opposed to a higher up-front cost if certain bulbs really do last longer and therefore cut down on the number of bulbs we purchase and the staff time to replace them.  Are LEDs the way to go?  Have color rendering issues been resolved to museum satisfaction?  What other cutting edge (or not) options are there that museums have used successfully themselves?

 

I have searched the listserv and looked at the many of the lighting discussions, but with the rapidly changing nature of the lighting world and in light of the recent ban, I figured one more post couldn’t hurt.  Bonus points for the “plain English” explanations!

 

Thanks in advance,

 

Jamin Landavazo
Chief Curator

 

Reno County Museum
100 S. Walnut
Hutchinson KS 67501
(620) 662-1184

 


Kansas Underground Salt Museum
3504 E. Ave G
Hutchinson KS 67501
(620) 662-1425

 



To unsubscribe from the MUSEUM-L list, click the following link:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-HOME.exe?SUBED1=MUSEUM-L&A=1



To unsubscribe from the MUSEUM-L list, click the following link:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-HOME.exe?SUBED1=MUSEUM-L&A=1