Proven Liable/slander in the US is just about impossible.   If it was then
every tabloid rag would be out of business already.  As it is very few law
suites against them succeed.    I am no lawyer but I read an article about
it recently and the standards needed to call it liable and slander and then
compete with the first amendment and then prove harm was intended is a
pretty tough case to prove according to the article.  I don't know I just
got that from the article.
Randy S. Little
http://www.rslittle.com <http://reel.rslittle.com>




On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 08:24, . . <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>  If a third party lies about an incident, then that third party is to be
> held responsible for libel, not the person asking concerning the incident.
> You are insinuating that I am being slanderous simply for asking about a
> possible theft in which the first party did, in fact, say a theft of sorts
> occurred.  Dear me!  If asking about a possible theft when someone has
> already admitted to it is libel, then I dare to say that the vast majority
> of the population is in legal trouble!
>
> -Isabella
>
>
>
> > Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 14:52:50 +0000
> > From: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re:
> ------------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe from the MUSEUM-L list, click the following link:
> http://home.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=MUSEUM-L&A=1
>

=========================================================
Important Subscriber Information:

The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).

If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).