Catherine,
 
The answer to your question is yes and no.  This is a generic problem with collections preservation advice - that is it both specific to the particular situation, and there are always exceptions.  The advice to remove "all organic materials from the house" would include textiles, wood, paints, finishes, paper, and so forth.  You would have to remove the wooden structural architectural framing, moldings, flooring, upholstery, drapery, carpeting, furniture, wall surfaces, paintings, and the like.  Hopefully, this was just an oversight on the part of the conservator performing the assessment.  It was a conservator, wasn't it?  Realistically, such advice can not be followed, as there would be very few collection objects and architectural structure remaining in the house. 
 
There are several relevant factors in your example.  One is that the straw has been present for a number of years.  The risk of insect problems, particularly introducing new insects to the collections, is greatest in the first few years.  After that point if there is no damage, leaving existing materials in the collection may be even safer than newly-introduced materials.  Second, it is true that straw is a poor nourishment medium for many species of both insects and rodents.  It also is of low risk for mold and mildew infestation.  Third, mice and other rodents will use any available fibrous material for nesting.  I have seen numerous instances of fiberglass insulation in ceilings and walls being used by mice for nests.  One would think that this would be at least unpalatable or at worst harmful to rodents, but apparently not.  Polyester probably would not fare any better (BTW, polyester is an organic material, and by the assessment decree, should be banned from the house).  In the absence of direct information to the contrary, it would seem that the straw is not more of a nesting risk than any of these synthetic materials.  The better alternative is to implement strategies that prevent, or at least discourage, rodent presence in the house as a whole.
 
My personal opinion, although not informed by examination of your specific circumstances, is that if you have not had problems to date, you are not likely to have them in the future.  Good luck!
 
Marc

American Conservation Consortium, Ltd.
     4 Rockville Road
     Broad Brook, CT 06016
     www.conservator.com
     860-386-6058
 
*Collections Preservation Consultation
*Conservation Assessments & Surveys
*Environmental Monitoring & Low-Tech Control
*Moisture Management Solutions
*Collections in Historic Structures
*Collections Care Grant Preparation
*Conservation Treatment of:
     Furniture
     Painted Wood
     Horse-Drawn Vehicles
     Architectural Interiors
     Decorative Objects & Folk Art
 

Marc A. Williams, President
     MS in Art Conservation, Winterthur Museum Program
     Former Chief Wooden Object Conservator, Smithsonian Institution
     Fellow, American Institute for Conservation (AIC)
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: [log in to unmask] href="mailto:[log in to unmask]">Cathy Dean
To: [log in to unmask] href="mailto:[log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask]
Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 1:35 PM
Subject: [MUSEUM-L] Straw in Museum Settings

Dear Listers,

 

One of our historic sites is presently wrestling with the issue of a straw mattress in their historic house interior. 

 

The straw has been in place for many years and thus far not (to my knowledge) caused any problems, and the staff like to use the “crunchy” feel of the mattress as a teaching moment, giving children and school groups a tactile experience of how one aspect of life was different in the 19th century.

 

They have received a recommendation as part of a conservation assessment to remove all organic materials (including the straw in the mattress ticking) from the house, which would also have been my first response as well.

 

However, a board member also consulted a colleague in a university entomology department at the nearby university, who did some research and concluded that because the straw is “non-nutritive” it would likely not harbor any bugs other than perhaps mites (which would hopefully be a non-issue, because the beds are not used). 

 

I said I would check with the list to see if anyone has had any direct experience with pest infestation in straw mattresses, bales, etc.  I’m also concerned that (leaving aside insects) straw might also harbor mice or other animals that use the straw as a nesting material. 

 

Also, has anyone found a good replacement for straw that would have that same tactile feel and look?  As always, budget is a major issue.  Elsewhere we use polyester fiberfill, but obviously that would feel nothing like straw. 

 

Thanks!

 

 

Catherine E. Dean

Curator of Collections

Preservation Virginia

804-314-5049

FAX: 804-648-5880

[log in to unmask]

 

========================================================= Important Subscriber Information:

The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).

If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).

========================================================= Important Subscriber Information:

The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).

If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).