Mark,
You are wise to ask. I’ve used
several systems over the years, and I suspect there are pluses and minuses to
each.
One major consideration: if your current records
are formatted in the letter position, it will be probably be easier to find
them in notebooks (provided the catalog number is on the right hand side of the
page) and if the records are formatted in landscape with the number at the top,
file folders will be easier.
Another consideration might be what type
of storage space you have available –shelves vs. file cabinets.
Notebooks: I’m currently in a place
that uses three ring notebooks, usually one per year or multiple years
depending on volume.
Advantage: it seems
to reduce misfiling and may be easier to use.
Drawbacks: 1) it takes
a lot of shelf space and if the notebook is crowded you have to fuss with reinforcing
ripped out holes and 2) it has been a struggle to keep the notebooks fully
upright on the shelf, --they have a tendency to flop when one is pulled out,
and unless they are completely full the pages inside may sag, making the
notebook go crooked and then they really don’t stand up! If
you do choose notebooks, buy very sturdy ones and be sure to use a D ring
rather than an O ring because it lessens the ripping of page holes and are
easier to flip through when looking for a sheet.
File Folders: (which I used
elsewhere) In that situation, once we had done the data entry (or, in earlier
days made catalog cards from the catalog worksheet) there was pretty much no
need to handle them again, although as time goes by and others work with that
collection there might be. At any rate, that system took the least space.
That also, as Amanda pointed out, allows for use of fire proof cabinets, which
I think is important.
One question might be whether file folders
have a worse risk for misplacing records (when pulled to work) with than
binders. (In either case you have to have a really good system for temporarily holding
sheets and getting them returned to their file or binder.)
Another system I have seen is storing
three ring binders in file cabinets, - some waste of space, but having them in
a fire-proof cabinet would be worth it. If you used no larger than 2”
binders (larger get heavy to lift from drawers) and each binder is full but not
too full, this might be a good way to go, if you can afford the file space,
since the pages are hanging from their 3 rings and not sagging.
I have never used bound notebooks for
catalog records, but it seems to me you would have a problem trying to
photocopy a page, and if you need to change or add any information, you would
have to handle the entire book. Our worksheets are pulled frequently as
our early cataloguing was quite inadequate and we’re checking the level
of detail now as we have occasion to handle them for storage location changes,
pulling for exhibit, etc. The sheets then go to data entry to update the
computer record, so having the sheets bound in books would be extremely
cumbersome. (I think the use of bound books is generally used for
original intake (accession) records and it is important that those be bound,
but those records don’t have the level of detail that a catalog record
has.)
Catalog cards, it seems to me, would have
to be large ones, to be useful at all. But in a natural history
collection they might be able to hold the information you need, and would,
indeed, take less space.
Hope this helps your decision making!
Lucy Sperlin
From: Museum
discussion list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Amanda Triepke
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 5:28 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [MUSEUM-L] Written
Museum records
We use a file folder system. We have
a file for each accession record that includes a print out of the accession
record from PastPerfect, copies of our purchasing paperwork (requisition,
check, etc.) and any miscellaneous paperwork that comes associated with an
item. The files are then stored in a schwab fireproof cabinet.
Amanda
Triepke
From:
Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2009 11:53
AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [MUSEUM-L]
Hi
I was wondering what folks are using as their primary medium
for written catalogue information and why. The options that I can think of are:
Bound notebooks
Catalogue Cards
Loose leaf-binders
I am contemplating changing our present system, but I was
hoping for some feedback before rushing madly into what would be a huge
project.
Many thanks for any feed back
Mark
Mark Walker
Curator
Telephone: (831) 648-5716 (ext. 12)
Fax: (831) 372-3256
The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).
If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes). ========================================================= Important Subscriber Information:
The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).
If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes). ========================================================= Important Subscriber Information:
The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).
If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).