Should we take another couple of days of silence as confirmation of the last sentence in Cindy's reasonable post?
----- Original Message -----
From: [log in to unmask] href="mailto:[log in to unmask]">Cindy Boyer
To: [log in to unmask] href="mailto:[log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask]
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 9:42 AM
Subject: Re: AAM accreditation

I believe I'm the member who posted the original question. 
 
What was interesting to me is that Alexandra was just about the only respondent to my question.
 
My organization is an unusual one, not just a museum but a historic preservation organization that also operates 2 house museums - so, for us, the question about re-accrediting is more complex.
 
While I agree that the self-study process can be useful to the organization,and includes questions that every institution should be able to answer, I still wonder about the programs' effectiveness in ratio to the expense - both out of pocket and for the staff time involved - for mid or smaller size museums.
 
Alexandra mentioned credibility, visibility, fundability. Credibility - in whose eyes? the general public, our colleagues, or AAM?  Visibility - same question. Fundability - we have been accredited for 30 years, and I can not think of one instance where it helped us get funding, with the possible exception of IMLS, when they offered general operating support.
 
I agree it would be an interesting topic at a conference. It would be interesting to see if our colleagues would actually address this issue in a more public forum. I wonder, if to "diss" accreditation would be seen as disrespecting the AAM.


From: Museum discussion list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Alexandra
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 6:30 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [MUSEUM-L] AAM accreditation

Dear Members of this list:

 

A few weeks ago, another member of this listserv asked what the point of getting an AAM accreditation or re-accreditation might be in that the process is so complex and time-consuming.  I responded that it increased credibility, visibility, and fundability, while demonstrating that the institution believes that its public funding means that it should be accountable and transparent, using best practices and so on.  Then I talked to a few colleagues who thought my position might not be as strong as I assumed, and wonder what your reaction might be to my statements.  Why do museums work to get accredited in the first place?  Is it worth it strategically?  It seems to me that this might be a discussion topic at a conference because people are conflicted about it.

 

I am completing an AAM re-accreditation project as an independent museum professional for the Harvard University Art Museums.  The process, while long and complicated, went well.  Some new channels of communications were opened or solidified, while whatever policies, procedures, plans, and strategies that were missing or lacking are now in place and HUAM believes that its claim of being one of the top educational and collecting museums is more demonstrable.  I agree.  I think it’s great, even expected, that museums large or small be accredited.  Do you?

 

Many thanks for your input!

Alexandra Rollins

 

Alexandra W. Rollins

Nonprofit and Arts Management

24 Goodrich Road

Jamaica Plain, MA  02130-2005

617-524-6007; fax 6037

www.rollinsupton.com

 

========================================================= Important Subscriber Information:

The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).

If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).

========================================================= Important Subscriber Information:

The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).

If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).

========================================================= Important Subscriber Information:

The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).

If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).