In other words, perception is reality.
Here’s the potential headline: “Local History Museum Discards
Donations.” You should have a staff discussion on how to respond to
the inevitable public reaction. Write up talking points if you have to,
then structure a release (rather than a reactive institutional statement) that
tells a positive story about how your institution is refining its collection and
making sure that what you hold is based in verifiable facts. Deaccessions
happen. It’s not illegal or unethical. It’s actually
part of a museum’s duty to the public to make those kinds of decisions.
It is rule #1 of media relations that whoever
tells the story first, gets to tell it their way. The other side is,
rightly or wrongly, put in the defensive position. That is not where you
want to be, because defenders almost always lose out in the court of public
opinion and, as
Julia Muney Moore
Public Art Administrator
Blackburn Architects,
(317) 875-5500 x230
From:
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006
12:21 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [MUSEUM-L] Strange
situation
…(snipped)
While it's not important in the grand scheme of things that I
understand deaccessioning (which, thanks to your info below, I have a better understanding
thereof), it can be important if deaccessioned items are perceived to be
trashed treasures. A story in a periodical offered to an ignorant
reporter by an incensed volunteer could have financial and public relations
consequences to the institution. ….(snipped) If you don't listen for the
warnings of the canary, the insitutions could get the shaft. It is, after
all, the canaries who help to sustain your salary.