FYI: I would be leery about auctioning a de-accessioned object or other  item 
on e-bay using an anonymous/individual account for a number of  reasons, that 
boil down to the appearance of being deceitful/evasive  (especially for 
tax/accounting documentation).
 
e-bay rules prohibit fundraising (for a non-profit) unless you sell as an  
individual or organizational e-bay member via e-bay's 'missionfish' (by which a  
non-profit is already a member of). Otherwise, the only way for a non-profit 
to  sell/auction with an ebay account used by an organization or an 
individual,  requires that the organization's name be indicated. It  is also required 
that the directors' signed permission and the non-profit's  501 (c) (3) ID# be 
scanned and presented on the actual auction listing.
 
An example of a way to avoid all this would be to give the de-accessioned  
item to someone who is not affiliated with the museum (and provide documentation 
 that no monies, etc., were exchanged) and trust that they will sell it (on 
ebay  or other means) without affiliating it with the name of the museum. And 
then  trust that they donate the proceeds to the museum and that  they 
collected and will pay sales tax from the sale of the item (if applicable). 
 
Now this would be your public relation's or even tax nightmare -if it  became 
known that a de-accessed object was sold in such a round-about manner. 
 
Museums bid and win auctions on ebay quite often. Personally I've never  come 
across an item being auctioned by or on behalf of a museum, but I have seen  
museums bid on and win auctions.
 
The reason for de-accessioning an item should be a valid reason to begin  
with and therefore one that you can refer to in an auction listing. And it  is 
important to indicate that the proceeds from the auction are earmarked  for a 
specific (or general) purpose...organizational costs, or for a  particular 
program/project.
 
'Monetary valuing' is inconsequential when auctioning an item for  
fundraising. What I was referring to was the re-sale of an artifact - that is  
different. I believe that it would be appropriate to have a stipulation for  the 
auction winner that, if the item were to be re-sold, the museum name  should in no 
manner be referred to in a subsequent transaction (mainly, to not  give the 
impression that there would be any proceeds from such a sale  that would again, 
benefit the museum if there is indeed, none).
 
I don't believe that there is 'trade-off' along the lines for which  you are 
thinking, and quite the adverse when you consider your accounts  receivable, 
sales taxes, and the monetary proceeds as a donation, etc. Doing  things on the 
sly are just that and will always have the potential of coming  back to haunt 
you.
 
Being honest and clear about the reasons for de-accessing an object and the  
proceeds in affiliation with your museum will do more good than harm.  
Personally, if I donated something to a museum (what if I myself had gotten  for free 
or at little cost?) and they didn't need it - I would be more than  thrilled 
if it got big bucks in an auction and even more thrilled that the  proceeds 
were more of a contribution than a useless, or even worthless  item.
 
Pam
 
 
 
In a message dated 9/20/2005 3:21:02 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
[log in to unmask] writes:

Pam,
 
My comment was really focused on eBay  auctions.  My thought with eBay is 
that it reaches so many people (not a  discrete set of buyers) that it would be 
prudent to not have that association  known.  It might impact the value the 
piece sells for without the  association, but in my mind, for my institution, I 
think that trade-off is  acceptable.  I don't think the Museum itself would be 
listed as the  seller.  Probably we would use an anonymous individual seller's 
account  so the connection to my institution was not apparent. (Assuming we 
even  disposed of an item via eBay.)
 
From a broader perspective, I feel, given  my history museum perspective 
(probably different from the art world), that we  should not encourage the 
monetary valuing of artifacts or encourage the  thinking that something is more 
valuable because it once belonged to a  museum.
 
Stacey




 
Pamela Silvestri, Museum Assistant
Northeast States Civilian  Conservation Corps Museum
Shenipsit State Forest
166 Chestnut Hill  Road
Stafford Springs, Connecticut 06076
(860)  684-3430

=========================================================
Important Subscriber Information:

The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).

If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).