On 1/31/05 11:18 AM, Joshua Steffen's electrons arrived as: > If they are unscientific, present the concept along side those which are > deemed scientific. Show how these ideas are should not be accepted. As long as > each side tries to use one-sided debates and does not openly discuss > definitions and concepts they we are all locked into our little box. That's fine - nobody's saying both versions cannot be presented. Personally, I think they should be. However, only one version is science -- so present the other in churches or in schools' religion classes. The problem is that the conclusions of science -- innocent of any agenda, I might add -- have led in a direction that does not correspond with the pre-ordained beliefs of the religious community. So that community has invented a low-res sciency religious theory and now wants a free ride to credibility and equivalence with the high-res evidence for evolution. It's not going to happen -- not because of political right/left bias or agendas, but because the ID science does not have enough merit. _____________________________________ S t e p h e n N o w l i n http://stephennowlin.v3.net _____________________________________ ========================================================= Important Subscriber Information: The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes). If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).