Kate,
Personally I would consider the image of the document a primary source if
it is the information contained in that document that is important.
A translation of that document would be a secondary source because
information in the document has been filtered and once removed from the
original. If, however, the researcher is looking beyond the
contents of a document to the physical form then the image is
secondary. Footnote would contain would contain URL and documents
physical location with further note that Web image was used.
Just my thoughts
.At 12:40 PM 09/10/2003, you wrote:
This is a question my education
coordinator asked that I pose to the group:
With more and more documents/photographs/images of objects from a
museum
collection posted to the web, students have begun to cite them as
primary
sources in their research. For example, a student may use a letter
written
by an historic person and found on a web-site - an image of the letter
is
there as well as a full transcription. Since it is only a digital
copy and
not the original, would it still be considered a primary source?
What if
only a transcription was provided, and not the image? If you
have some
insight into this, or just a good opinion, please respond to Brian Banton
at
[log in to unmask] Thanks!
Kate Higgins
Curator
Pejepscot Historical Society
159 Park Row
Brunswick, ME 04011
207-729-6606
207-729-6012 (fax)
=========================================================
Important Subscriber Information:
The Museum-L FAQ file is located at
http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/
. You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).
If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).
Barbara O'Brien
Archivist
McDaniel College
(410) 857-2793
[log in to unmask]