I second Brian's observation that it's more
important what you do in your first job than how long you stay... But I
would add that, IMHO, there are different schools of thought from a hiring
perspective. With many employers wanting experience, the idea of stability
with a new employee is important. (i.e. - if that five years of experience
was gained by working at five different institutions over that period - and
those positions weren't hired as temporary positions - I'd be wondering as an
employer if I'd be hiring for the same position again in a year or two.)
Hiring and training is an expensive and time-consuming task, and employers do
consider the prospective longevity of those they hire (at least I
do).
Second, if there are good reasons for changing
jobs in a short period, be up front about them. I believe that in this
business NO ONE would count against a person leaving a lower paid interpreter
job for a position that better reflects your interest and financial
requirements. Everyone understands the idea of getting your foot in the
door and moving up the organizational structure when opportunities
arise.
Honestly, however, it may be more difficult to
move "up" at another institution if you don't have more than a year or
so in your first position.
Just some thoughts, sounds like a tough spot...
GOOD LUCK
Melinda Gilpin