MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
karen liebel <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 14 Jan 1998 19:16:46 -0700
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (27 lines)
In regards to this question:

> > Does anyone on museum-l have any information on the harmful effects (or
> > lack of harmful effects) of electronic flash photography on paintings,
> > manuscripts and paper works of art?

This was the response:

> None whatsoever....(depending on how often works on paper are being
> exposed to flashlight...)
>
> The worst effect is on the eyes of guards standing near famous
> paintings that are being photographed all day long. That is the main
> reason not to allow the use of flashlights in museums.

It is my understanding watercolours are, especially, negatively affected by
light, so frequent flashes of brilliant light could be destructive.
Additionally, keep in mind that a well-known piece can be flashed by
hundreds of people in a day which means a large exposure to bright lights
daily. That could be why flash photography is not allowed...too hard to
stipulate which areas can and cannot be photographed.

Just a thought.

Karen Liebel
University of Alberta

ATOM RSS1 RSS2