MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Hank Burchard <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 29 May 1996 11:41:35 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
On Tue, 28 May 1996, Stephen Nowlin wrote:

> >Prior to her promotion to curator, the acting curator had engaged in
> >accepting a donation from a local resident of some bunny rabbits. The deal
> >fell in my sister's lap. The donor had not been apprised of the petting
zoo's
> >standard donation form which says (and I paraphrase from memory): We have
the
> >right to sell your donation and/or FEED it to another animal in our
> >collection. My question is, how can those of us in non-zoos adopt this
> >strategy effectively to avoid having to take things into our collection that
> >we cannot properly take care of :-)
> >
> >- Adrienne
>
> Great story.  Talk about deaccessioning to maintain the collection!

     Point of order here. If you feed a zoo's rabbit to the zoo's fox, can
that be called deaccessioning? Isn't that just internal downsizing?

     Hank Burchard * <[log in to unmask]> * Washington DC | USA

ATOM RSS1 RSS2