MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Matthew Weinstein <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 22 Apr 1994 09:08:54 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
John,
 
The problem is that even in coming up with the hypothesis culture and hence
politics has already consumed the process. Take your example of Agassiz
 
>The only
>science involved in this was demonstrating that one can measure certain
>racial characteristics in people.
 
But race itself is a cultural, historic construction, not a natural one
"found out there." The probe and the subsequent conclusions are contiguous
and continuous and can't simply be separated into "pure" science and
"application." The dream of the "pure" I would contend is a fantasy of a
truth beyond the foibles of human politics, but as Donna Haraway reminds
us: all knowledge is situated and partial and (hence) political.
 
--In dialogue
 
Matthew Weinstein
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2