MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Robert A. Baron" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 14 Jan 1998 17:57:07 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
Is there any literature on this?
robt

At 10:31 PM 1/14/98 +0100, Jaap van der Burg wrote:

>Robert A. Baron wrote:
>>
>> Does anyone on museum-l have any information on the harmful effects (or
>> lack of harmful effects) of electronic flash photography on paintings,
>> manuscripts and paper works of art?
>>
>> Thanks for your information.
>>
>> =================================
>> Robert A. Baron
>> mailto:[log in to unmask]
>> http://www.pipeline.com/~rabaron/
>
>
>Of Course Flash lights do effect objects. However as with all damaging
>factors, the issue is more what do you deem acceptible and what not.
>A light level of 50 lux with 75uW/lum UV is accepted in a permanent
>exhibition. (8 hours 365 days per year for 10/15/25(?) years.
>Compared a flashlight with maybe 5000 lux and 300uW/lum UV for 1/250 of
>a second tots up to about 2 seconds normal lighting.
>
>Clearer is the damage to eyes, and do not forget the security camera's.
>
>Hope this is of use.
>
>Jaap van der Burg
>Collection Care & Consult
>(www.xs4all.nl/~gerlach/ccc)
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2