I believe that a museum -- as a public trust -- ought to be as inclusive as
possible of  relevant viewpoints and perspectives.  From that follows the
policy that in a "public" controversy (as opposed to a purely internal one),
it is always appropriate to give consideration to all parties involved.
This does not mean that it is necessary to follow their advice, but at least
to listen to it and acknowledge them.
-----Original Message-----
From: Collection Care Management <[log in to unmask]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.museum-l
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Sunday, April 12, 1998 10:10 PM
Subject: controversy


>I am student at the University of Iowa and am currently working on a paper
>about controversy in the museum.  I am interested in the decisions museum
>management personnel make concerning the interpretation of controcersial
>objects and displays.  Specifically, I am interested in examining whether
>or not museums have an obligation to contact and include the views of all
>parties influenced by the controversy.
>
>Thank you for your time.  I thank you in advance for your response.
>
>If you would rather reply off list:
>Blake Cooper
>[log in to unmask]