MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ross Weeks <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 2 Apr 1999 10:06:46 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
I agree that interest in museums (whether or not we like it) tends to be
part of middle-aging.  People start taking their children there....the
children grow up....people have leisure time and are thirsty to learn, be
entertained, whatever it is we do.

Psychographic  -- yikes, where is the Mother Tongue headed?
Ross Weeks Jr.
http://histcrab.netscope.net


-----Original Message-----
From: Melissa A Washburn <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: the Gen-X thread


>Regarding the whole discussion about getting Gen-X into the museum:
>
>        I have two distinct opinions on the subject; one being that it's
>probably more effective to give younger kids museum experiences, thereby
>ensuring that even if they do take a few years off from visiting during
>their teens and twenty-somethings, they are very likely to return during
>middle age (I base this on all the studies done showing that early museum
>experiences tend to predict museum attendance as adults).
>        My other thought is that yes, it is very dangerous to define a
>whole age group by one psychographic profile, as one of the major cola
>companies found out when trying to aggressively market "OK Cola" to
>"Gen-Xers  <snip>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2