MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Eric Siegel <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 15 Sep 1994 11:39:52 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
          Well, these issues have been thrashed out pretty thoroughly
          in the four or five months that I've been participating in
          this list.
 
          I would suggest that you get a look at the index of museum-l
          and refer to some of these discussion.
 
          My take on the issues you raised: 1) Images of artwork look
          terrible on computer, and are not a "threat" to the
          visitorship at museums. Also a better educated population is
          good for all of us. 2) Other types of collections having
          images on the net are largely useful to scholars. We at the
          New York Botanical Garden want to make our herbarium
          specimens available that way, to allow botanists to browse
          through the collection. I can tell you that for us, a
          comprehensive visual database is at least a decade off.
          3) Collections information on the net is not a threat, and
          security measures are readily integrated into net access.
          Libraries have been on line through OCLC and RLIN for years,
          and noone suggests that this poses a threat.
 
 
          Eric Siegel
          [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2